This gallery contains 23 photos.
It’s baaaaaaaaack. Just a week from today, the NFL kicks off. Finally, life has meaning again.
My mind is filled with questions:
Will Big Ben and the Steelers be the Stillers again? (That’s how we say it “in the burgh.”) RB Le’Veon Bell returns in his sophomore season finally healthy, and RB LeGarrette Blount joins the backfield as a free agent. Will the black and gold’s offense resemble the Jerome Bettis days?
Will the Dolphins finally challenge for the AFC East? We’ll find out next Sunday, as the Fins host the Patriots. It’s a 1 p.m. game, and I’m hoping it’ll be 98 degrees with 95 percent humidity. QB Ryan Tannehill enters his third season with a brand new offense installed by new OC Bill Lazor, who was with the Philadelphia Eagles last year. So there will be lots of speed, motion and quick decision-making by #17, but behind an offensive line that features five new starters, after center Mike Pouncey underwent offseason surgery.
Will the Rams be able to overcome the loss of QB Sam Bradford?
Will Peyton Manning and the Broncos match or top last season’s record-setting offensive production?
Will the Seahawks dominate again, or experience a letdown?
Wait a minute. I’m off track here for the theme of this blog. Let’s get to the burning question that’s really on my mind:
Will Carrie Underwood go classy, or once again, slobby for the opening theme song of Sunday Night Football?
Having “Faith” in Underwood, assures she’ll go slobby again, and that thought has been driving me crazy for weeks.
During her reign as performer of the “Waitin’ all day for Sunday Night” theme song for SNF, Faith Hill went the way of the bear, wearing dresses or short-shorts, always bare-legged.
I suppose it’s possible she was wearing pantyhose under these very weird boots, but even if she did, it doesn’t count since she’s not showing enough leg anyway.
In any case, one would be hard pressed to call any of the outfits she wore to perform the SNF intro theme professional or classy.
In replacing Hill last season, I so hoped Underwood would show a little class, but that didn’t happen.
Instead, she wore denim short-shorts, a sleeveless top and cowboy boots, complete with “bear” legs.
What will Underwood wear for the opening act of SNF this season? Probably something else equally disappointing, including, of course, bear legs again.
I do hope I’m wrong, but whatever she wears, the chances that she will have on pantyhose are about as good as completing a Hail Mary pass for a touchdown.
As it turns out, in searching for Carrie Underwood on the Internet, I stumbled upon this video.
So, if this is the final wardrobe selection, we have our answer: Underwood once again will underwhelm, wearing a very short and strange-looking dress that appears tattered, comfortable-looking high-heel sandals, and, you guessed it, bear legs. Pause frame at 0:12/2:50.
I’ve written it before (last year, actually), but it’s worth repeating: The NFL has gone to great lengths to improve its image during the past several years. It’s a privilege to play in the league and to be associated with the NFL in all capacities.
The NFL is a multi-billion dollar business. (In the preview video, Fred Gaudelli, Coordinating Producer, Sunday Night Football, says “Sunday Night Football is the Number 1 show on television …”)
And, in almost every case, everyone associated with the NFL who appears on TV dresses very professionally. The guys in the booth, Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth, who call and comment on the game, wear business suits and ties.
Similarly, the female hosts on NFL Network wear pantyhose with their dresses and heels, alongside the male hosts and analysts who wear suits. (I’ve since been corrected about this. Well, for a while there, Lindsay Rhodes used to wear quite beautifully, though I haven’t seen her in a long time, so I really don’t know now, and Amber Theoharis was wearing for a while, but apparently now, she’s gone the way of the Grizzly. Too bad. She used to look awesome.)
And remember, all NFL cheerleaders wear pantyhose with their uniforms, even in the hottest months in the hottest cities.
If all these people dress with professionalism and class, why can’t Carrie Underwood, an otherwise professional singer/songwriter, do the same when representing the NFL?
It’s not like she doesn’t know what pantyhose are. She’s worn sheer pantyhose to perform on other stages.
No, sadly, this is a choice made by Underwood, the costume designer, the director, the producer, and/or anyone associated with bringing this act to the SNF stage.
And shame on all of them for wanting their star to prance around the stage of the most-watched show on Sunday night as if she were ushering in a barbeque for the big ho-down.
Way to go, folks.
NFL losing its mind
Seems to me that the NFL is getting goofy these days anyway. I get trying to protect players by making it illegal for tacklers (and ball carriers) to initiate contact by leading with the head, using the helmet as a weapon. I agree with penalties for grasping the facemask and for horse-collar tackles.
I can even see the point of emphasizing the enforcement of illegal hands to the face, but, c’mon, this is football. Things like that are going to happen occasionally, accidentally.
But this business of moving the starting point of the kickoff up to the 35 yard line to discourage a runback — ostensibly, the most exciting play in the game? What genius came up with that one?
And I understand the NFL wants more scoring, but not allowing the DBs to touch a receiver after 5 yards? And don’t get me started on PI. Today, all a veteran quarterback has to do on 3rd and forever is throw deep, knowing there’s a better than average chance the defender will be called for pass interference, resulting in an automatic first down.
Then, there’s roughing the passer. Since the days of Hall of Famer Dan Marino, and soon-to-be HOFers Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady, the NFL has wanted to protect the quarterback. I appreciate that. But today, you can barely touch a QB without getting penalized. You’ve seen it:
A defensive end or a rushing outside linebacker (or even a Safety on a corner blitz) gets to the QB, makes contact, but the signal caller magically wiggles out of a sure sack, scrambles to find a now-open receiver and completes a pass for a first down. And I’m not just talking Big Ben here. He does that routinely because he’s like 6-5, 265 pounds, and that’s just part of his game. He’s practically patented that move. I am talking about almost any QB today is able to escape being sacked, and I think it’s because defenders are concerned about getting penalized for roughing the passer. I’m not saying it’s a conscious decision by defenders. I just believe it’s in the back of their minds, causing them to hold up a bit.
C’mon, NFL, let these guys play football.
That’s right, I’m a petite little thing who wears nothing but dresses or skirts and heels and sheer pantyhose every day … and I know football. (A dream come true, aint I?)
Sorry for the rant, but these things have been bothering me for some time now, and what am I gonna do — write to the NFL? Puh-leeeeease.
Back to reality
Longtime readers here know I do not like, and cannot tolerate missed opportunities for entertainers to do the right thing.
I wrote this last season, and I’ll write it again here: There are so many more professional, credible, exciting performers who are much more glamorous than Carrie Underdog (not a typo).
If whoever is behind the production of the SNF opening theme song cared (obviously, he or she, or they don’t), a more professional and glamorous performer could do an exciting version of “Waitin’ all day for Sunday Night,” and look fabulous at the same time.
That guy I mentioned earlier, Fred Gaudelli, Coordinating Producer, Sunday Night Football, says of the SNF intro theme show for 2014: “It’s got a major star in Carrie Underwood. That’s the right star to open up a show like Sunday Night Football.”
Seriously? I soooo disagree.
In April of last year before Underwood was announced as the new SNF intro theme performer, I had written a post recommending a few stars I hoped would be considered to replace Hill (Who should NBC hire next to perform intro to SNF?) and my first choice was Katy Perry.
When I found out it was Underwood, I was disappointed. Why another country singer like Hill? Why someone else who likely would dress like she’s performing in a saloon?
In that post last year, I included a poll, and most of those who participated picked Katy, as well. (I like being right.)
Today, I still believe Katy Perry, Beyonce’, Rihanna and Jennifer Lopez would be better choices to do the SNF opening, as each is more professional and much classier than Carrie Underwear (again, not a typo).
I know those ladies would wear a fabulous costume that included sheer pantyhose. And this time, I’d add to that list Jessie J, and maybe Ke$ha and Shakira.
As far as I am concerned, consideration still should go to Selena Gomez and now Ariana Grande, but I do believe both are a bit too young and don’t have the credibility for such a venue yet.
Still, I am convinced both would at least have the good sense, good taste, professionalism and class to wear sheer pantyhose with their outfits. Something Carrie Underwhelming doesn’t seem to have.
Really, if I were producing the SNF opening theme, I’d probably feature a different performer each week singing her own version of that song.
And if SNF really wanted Underwood to do the singing for the first episode, I’d go for that. She could sing the song, but I’d get the Radio City Rockettes to do the actual performance.
That’s how you open Sunday Night Football, people!
Out of sheer morbid curiosity, I will watch the SNF intro performance next Sunday, but as Johnny Dangerously would say — “Once!”
I just want to see the pageantry and imagine what could have been one time. But after that, every Sunday night, I will have the telecast on until the intro theme comes on, at which time I will change the channel until I think it’s over, and then I’ll rejoin the program. My little way of protesting this missed opportunity.
Will you join me in this? Not sure it will make any difference, but it’ll make me feel better.
OK, your comments please. And please take the new poll. Tell us who you’d rather see perform the SNF intro theme.
Alright, alright, don’t get excited. This isn’t about a contest where you can don a pair of pantyhose with the hope of winning a cool million dollars.
If it was that catchy headline that brought you here for the first time, only to find that this is a blog devoted to wearing pantyhose (and you had no idea that such a thing even existed), let me save you from reading further. In fact, if you are one of those women who wouldn’t wear pantyhose (God forbid …) even if someone actually paid you $1 million to do so, you certainly aren’t going to like this blog.
On the other hand, if you are neutral as far as pantyhose go, and just curious, well, welcome to The ActSensuous Blog.
Of course, longtime readers here know that this blog enthusiastically beats up on pantyhose haters and happily lavishes praise upon girls who love pantyhose, or at least have the good sense and class to wear them for all the right reasons.
You know, it wasn’t that long ago that pantyhose were practically run (pun intended) permanently out of town. But thanks to some very professional and always-classy celebrities (Christie Brinkley, Kate Middleton, Milla Jovovich to name a few), and so many young stars (including Ariana Grande, Katy Perry, Miranda Cosgrove and Selena Gomez) pantyhose are beginning to look all mainstream again.
I don’t know how much of an effect those stars have had on everyday females, but a search of the Internet shows that there are millions of “real girls in pantyhose” everywhere in the world.
Seeing the mind-boggling number of pictures of everyday girls wearing pantyhose in every imaginable venue makes me wonder whether there ever really was a threat that pantyhose could really be ripped out of lingerie drawers forever.
While not long ago, haters tried to convince the world that pantyhose are irrelevant and “not in fashion” in today’s society, now, I am wondering how much thought women give to that idea, if they ever really did?
One of the ways I gauge this is how often or not pantyhose show up in mainstream entertainment venues? And I don’t mean just movies and television shows. I’m seeing pantyhose on more and more TV commercials, in magazines, and even at fashion shows.
Thankfully, that’s not even a surprise anymore today, but how about those “real girls?” I don’t have the time or patience to sit in front of the computer and search the Internet to see how prevalent pantyhose wearing is among normal people. But how else can I see “real girls” in situations where they at least have the opportunity to wear pantyhose for the right reasons?
There’s one place, and I particularly like it. It’s the reality show, America’s Got Talent.
I have to confess that I’ve never watched a single episode of American Idol or The Voice, but from what I can tell from commercials, the competition is for singers only. I really like AGT, now entering its ninth season, because you never know what you’re going to see — singers, dancers, magicians, escape artists, jugglers, sword swallowers, ventriloquists, you name it. It’s the ultimate variety show. The other thing I like about the show is the performers are from every age group and every background imaginable. Some of the contestants have had their particular talent for most of their lives, but never had the opportunity to share it with a real audience, and so they hold regular jobs, and now finally have a chance to live their lifelong dreams thanks to AGT.
It’s also a competition where the ladies at least have the opportunity to grace their legs with sheer pantyhose. Many do, but too many don’t.
So here’s the reason for that headline: The contestants are competing against a massive number of other hopefuls performing acts of every talent imaginable for a prize that includes $1 million and his or her own headline act in Las Vegas. They’re doing it on the biggest stage they’ve ever seen in their lives. And on the ladies, some of those costumes are pretty skimpy.
So I find it intriguing to see which of the girls wear pantyhose. To my delight, it appears that the majority of the performers do wear. And even though I know it’s going to happen, I’m sometimes a bit surprised and always disappointed when someone doesn’t choose to wear pantyhose, but really should.
Good thing I’m not a judge
It’s the biggest stage these performers ever have, and likely ever will, perform on in fulfilling their dreams to share their talents with a national audience.
Here’s the thing. It’s a million dollar prize, people! And you’re in Radio City Music Hall (among other venues). You’re performing for the first time in front of thousands of people, and millions more watching from home around the country.
So, what if wearing pantyhose helped the performer win $1 million? The point is, why risk it by not wearing them?
What I wonder is why there is any question? The contestants’ legs look so much better under the lights in pantyhose, and that will give them more confidence.
It’s a good thing I’m not a judge on this show because if I were, I’d say something to those who didn’t wear pantyhose during my comment/vote session. Probably, I’d say something like: “That was a great performance. You certainly have talent. I love the costume, but listen, you’re competing for a million dollar prize here. Get yourself a pair of pantyhose (bimbo).”
Admittedly, in the act at left, it would have been difficult and more dangerous if the female had been wearing pantyhose since she obviously needs to be able to feel the grip on her partner’s head. This might be the only justification for footless pantyhose to exist, and many girls wear them for performances like this one.
Then again, the sad truth is even the two female judges, Heidi Klum and Mel B, don’t wear pantyhose, and they’re … the judges.
OK, well, I should say the two female judges hardly ever wore pantyhose until this season when Heidi has been wearing a few times already.
I used to really not like Heidi very much, but now, I’m beginning to like her a lot.
For this post, I found a few pictures of her in her fishnet pantyhose, but there have been a few cases in which she was actually wearing sheer nude pantyhose (not fishnets), and looking absolutely fabulous. Wish I could have found one those pictures to show you.
Now, sadly, it appears as if Mel B can’t be bothered to wear pantyhose. I’ve never seen her wear pantyhose once. And she really should. And I don’t mean just because she’s a judge on AGT. She really should wear. Her legs could benefit greatly from pantyhose.
In all fairness, I have to say it’s at least possible that Mel B actually is wearing sheer pantyhose in the photo above. It’s not easy to tell (for my eyes anyway), but I have to acknowledge that it’s possible.
Oddly enough, I found one pic of her in pantyhose for an AGT publicity shoot, but as far as I can tell, she never has worn during any real episode.
This picture of Mel B in the red dress complete with sheer nude pantyhose is amazing. When she looks this awesome wearing pantyhose, I can’t understand why she wouldn’t dress this way much more often.
During each episode, there are a few behind-the-scenes bits that are shown following commercial breaks before getting back to the competition. This is where I’ve seen Heidi wearing some gorgeous sheer nude pantyhose backstage.
A sheer stunner
In one behind-the-scenes segment of the second episode this season, Heidi was riding in a limousine to the AGT studio. The limo stopped to pick up Mel B, and when she got in, she immediately noticed Heidi’s outfit, a short dress, and to my delight, she said to Heidi:
“I like this,” referring to Heidi’s pantyhose. Then, to my surprise, Mel B caressed Heidi’s leg. It was amazing. Mel B ran her hand from just above Heidi’s knee all the way down her leg and back up again, feeling her pantyhose.
And Heidi responded: “I like fishnet stockings.” Trust me, they were pantyhose, but I don’t care if Heidi wants to say stockings instead. I just like that she wears them, and I love that Mel B felt her leg up.
It’s cool since Mel B almost never wears pantyhose herself, so the fact that she likes them on Heidi and actually felt her leg up seems somehow vindicating to me. Or maybe it should make me even more disappointed in Mel B. She likes pantyhose on Heidi, yet, still won’t wear them herself.
Oh well. I guess you can’t have everything. I take my wins however they come, and this incident seemed like a win to me.
One of DirecTV’s ad campaign slogans is “If you call yourself a sports fan, you have to get DirecTV.”
If you like the variety show entertainment genre’, and you are a lover of pantyhose, you really should be watching AGT.
You just never know what you’re going to see, such as this bow and arrow marksman shooting balloons held by his lovely assistant, wearing pantyhose, of course.
Yes, there will be times when contestants dazzle with fantastic performances, but unfortunately, miss opportunities to accentuate their beauty by going “bear”-legged. Do they look good? Yes. But they could have done the right thing and looked even better.
But then the next act you see might feature another great performance, only this time with the artists classing up the joint in pantyhose.
Here’s a husband and wife team who performed an exciting strength and acrobatic routine. How about that outfit on the wife?
Once again, the female team member has to be barefoot to perform the stunts with precision and safety, but she has the professionalism and class to wear a sheer body stocking (albeit, footless).
I didn’t see this act, but unfortunately, the female performer didn’t feel the need to wear sheer pantyhose with her hot little number. That’s OK you say because she’s doing an acrobatic floor routine and needed to be barefoot?
It just doesn’t look very attractive. And she could have looked much more feminine by at least wearing footless pantyhose, like …
… this duo. They need to feel with their feet, but they still went the extra mile to make their legs look so much prettier by wearing footless pantyhose.
Don’t even get me started.
Please … Million dollar prize you’re competing for, people.
Niiiiice! Good job with that outfit. That’ll surely get you in the running for $1 million.
Much better. Not a great outfit, but at least this performer had the good sense and class to wear sheer pantyhose.
Once again, this entertaining act features a female assistant who sadly doesn’t see the need for pantyhose. Instead, she looks … boring.
Now, here’s a magic act. These kinds of acts are usually pretty cool, and more often than not, the lovely female assistants really are lovely in sheer pantyhose.
It just looks so much more appealing when the girls wear sheer pantyhose, and it shows they take the competition seriously.
Even the funny acts often feature a lovely assistant in pretty pantyhose. Here, this kung fu master attempts to stop time with his superior qi energy. Hey, at least, his lovely assistant knows the time of day.
Again, more often than not, dance and acrobatic performers show their professionalism and class by wearing sheer pantyhose with their outfits.
C’mon, what’s really the big deal about whether the female contestants wear pantyhose with their costumes, some of you ask? Listen, it’s about doing the right thing. Not only are these performers competing for a prize of $1 million, they’re also vying for a chance to headline a show in Las Vegas.
Think anyone’s going to give these budding stars a shot at performing in Vegas when, no matter how great their acts are, they dress like they’re on stage at their high school auditoriums?
And if you still think it’s much ado about nothing, consider this: For all but one of them, this is their 15 minutes of fame. Likely, it’s the greatest show they’ll ever perform. Why wouldn’t they want to look their absolute best? Why would they risk not being taken seriously enough, when it is so easy (and the right thing to do) to wear pantyhose, especially, when they see that the majority of their competitors are wearing pantyhose?
Maybe it’s like everything else in life. Some people get it. Others just don’t.
What would you do if you had an opportunity to perform your talent on the biggest stage in the country, be all casual about it? Or, take it seriously? In case it hasn’t sunk in still, I’ll say it one more time — the judges are looking for a million dollar act, people!
I don’t care if some of these girls have never worn pantyhose a day in their lives, and won’t ever do it again as long as they live. On the biggest performance night in their lives, they should step up. Most of them put so much money and effort into the equipment, the props, getting their costumes just right. But if they forego pantyhose either because they think it’s not important, don’t care, or probably worse, don’t even give it a thought, they are merely hurting themselves.
What do you think, readers?
In any event, I’m telling you, for a wide variety of entertainment and lot’s of pretty girls wearing sheer pantyhose, you can’t beat America’s Got Talent .
America’s Got Talent is on from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. EST Tuesdays on NBC.
This week was one of the most eventful in the 13 years ActSensuous has been in business. On Wednesday, we launched a brand new website, coinciding with the introduction of an all-new product — Act IV.
Longtime readers know that I keep this blog separate from the business end of ActSensuous. In other words, I write the blog for your (and my own) entertainment, and that’s its purpose. It has always been for everyone, and it doesn’t matter whether you’re an ActSensuous customer or not. (The vast majority of you aren’t, including those who are the most loyal readers and commenters. And that’s perfectly OK.)
Many of you have written to me stating your respect and appreciation for my keeping the blog at arm’s length from the company. (And I appreciate that you appreciate that.) But, at least a couple of times, I’ve broke my own rule. Always for a good cause though.
This is one of those cases. I thought you might like to know the back story behind the launch of Act IV and the new website.
I conceived and created ActSensuous in 2001 after discovering I could no longer find the kind of pantyhose I’d always loved. I had been buying only 100 percent nylon, completely sheer-to-waist pantyhose for years, and all of a sudden this style was nowhere to be found. I looked everywhere, even online, but at the time, they just weren’t around. As this was 2001 — the very heyday of the “bear” legs movement (new readers, see explanation in the “About me” section here), it shouldn’t have been a surprise.
I finally met the buyer at my favorite department store and asked her about this. She told me the manufacturer her store was getting these pantyhose from was going out of business. Just another casualty in what would become an all-too-frequent occurrence in this new era of women preferring to go bear- legged.
Long story short (you’re welcome), I and my partner contacted that manufacturer and offered to buy the last of their inventory. ActSensuous was born. My thinking: If I was distraught about no longer being able to buy 100 percent nylon, completely sheer-to-waist pantyhose, maybe at least a handful of other women were feeling the same way. I never imagined at that time that hundreds of thousands of women (and men) actually do love this style.
For the first few years, it looked as if I had grossly overestimated the love and desire for — not just this style — but for pantyhose of any kind … period. Nevertheless, fully understanding the gamble (if not insanity) in starting a pantyhose business during the very height of the bear legs movement, I was determined to try to lead the cause to bring back all-nylon, all-sheer pantyhose — even if singlehandedly.
Somehow, the product I acquired from the manufacturer that was going under wasn’t exactly what I was used to buying. (Still not sure how THAT happened.) The quality just wasn’t there, but I was not going to be deterred. I called our product simply ActSensuous after the name I chose for my company, and at that time, I never dreamed we’d have anything but this one product in three colors (Black, Nude and Suntan).
Enter Act II
But after two years of struggling with a pretty cheap product in a bad market, I created a new product to replace the original. I called it Act II (thought that was pretty clever) .
Act II was a huge improvement over the original line. And for the next 10 years, it served its purpose well. Act II are 100 percent nylon, completely sheer-to-waist pantyhose. What does that mean? They are made of nothing but nylon (no Lycra/spandex), and have no gusset panel. But even though they are sheer-to-waist, I never liked that reinforced area that sits just below the waistband. It’s called the finger band, and its purpose is to prevent one from puncturing the fabric with the thumb when putting the pantyhose on.
Since they are all-nylon, we made Act II with a slightly tight knit to prevent sagging. Act II were wildly popular, and even though I was living with the finger band, there was just one thing that I felt I hadn’t accomplished in Act II.
The reason I always loved 100 percent nylon pantyhose is because of the sensual feel of the fabric moving on the leg (and in the hand of the person touching the leg). If you don’t know, or can’t imagine that feeling, you ought to investigate this.
To me, there is nothing sexier. The ActSensuous style of pantyhose is decidedly delicate. Wearing ActSensuous is like flirting with trouble. There’s a sense of vulnerability — for the wearer, and for the one who wants the wearer. The pantyhose have to be treated as the beautiful, delicate, delicious little number they are. What could be more feminine?
Act II are like that, but that slightly tight knit we used was for more practical applications. They are delicate and they move. But not much.
Act III takes stage
So, in 2009, I invented Act III. It had all the design features of Act II, except they were made in a slightly loose knit. For a while, Act III captured the hearts of everyone. Our customers from nearly every country in the world (even Bangladesh), told us that Act III were the softest, silkiest and most comfortable pantyhose they had every worn. Oh yeah, and the sexiest.
Voila! I had done it. Now, customers had a choice: Sexy but practical (Act II), or really, really sexy (Act III). My work was done here. Oh wait, not so fast. Eventually, we experienced some issues.
First, the nylon fabric of Act III was so delicate, the pantyhose were not standing up to the production process. They were being ripped to shreds. The answer appeared to be making the panty area out of a slightly more durable nylon mesh fabric, which was supposed to blend with the rest of the product. It’s pretty much invisible in Cinnamon, Nude and Suntan, but in Coffee and Pink, that mesh area stands out a little. Black was something else altogether. It just seems too grainy in places.
Act II changed too. An unintended cross-stitch crept into the production line, causing a slight reinforcement where the panty and the legs join. A couple of batches came out that way, but we didn’t know about the issue for a while because the new inventory was integrated into old inventory. It wasn’t until a few customers asked what the deal was that I even learned about it.
A new door opens
For a while, I was depressed. My dream pantyhose had flaws. Under the circumstances, I felt I could no longer state that our pantyhose were “completely sheer-to-waist.” Let me take a minute here and say that we must have the most loyal customers in the world. Whenever someone alerted me to an issue in either product, of course, I immediately made adjustments, and our customers were amazingly understanding and supportive. And loyal.
I vowed to fix the issues, but there was a bit of resistance within our plant in North Carolina surrounding how things were to be done. Even after repeatedly emphasizing the changes in the production process I wanted, it was a hit-or-miss process in getting Act II and Act III fixed to my own satisfaction.
Ultimately, I saw this as an opportunity. Since I couldn’t rely on the process for fixing Act II and Act III, I’d just ditch the two lines altogether and start over with a brand new product. Really, it was the excuse I needed to create Act IV — my vision for the most beautiful, decidedly feminine and sexiest pantyhose available anywhere in the world.
After another missed opportunity for a special campaign honoring Valentine’s Day 2013, I sat down with my buddy, Deb R., Director of R&D, and her assistant, Salina D., and explained my dream of Act IV.
Both women were totally receptive, but both are also more experienced (and more realistic) than me, and they politely told me the last thing I wanted to hear: “It can’t be done.”
They said “We really just can’t (translation: ‘shouldn’t’) make 100 percent nylon pantyhose in a slightly loose knit and completely sheer-to-waist in an ultra delicate fabric. But, if we added a little Lycra to the fabric … maybe.”
Were they kidding me? They know how I feel about this. But they said “Just a little spandex. It’ll make them more durable.”
I might be a bit stubborn (who, me?), and I am the president after all, so we somehow agreed to try anyway. We came close a few times, but I was never in love with the color, or the texture, or the knit, or the look, or the feel. We kept trying. And trying.
I can’t tell you how many times NC sent me samples (I’m in Florida). When we finally all agreed on something that was close, I’d have a dozen or so pieces made and send them to a few loyal customers/guinea pigs.
I am so grateful to them (they know who they are) for their honest feedback. I was wise enough to realize I was too close to the process. I either liked everything or nothing. I needed the feedback of other girls (some of them professional models). Their input was so helpful because it gave me the conviction I needed to continue pushing R&D and Quality to go back to the drawing board.
There were times even I believed Act IV would never happen. But thanks to the open-mindedness, dedication, hard work and positive attitudes of Deb and Salina, we finally did what we weren’t supposed to be able to do. We made Act IV to the exacting standards of my longtime vision.
It ended up taking 13 months before we could launch Act IV. Along the way, we missed Christmas 2013, Valentines Day 2014 and even a March 2014 Mrs. America beauty pageant. But Act IV are here and all is right in the world (my world anyway).
Act IV are made in a 100 percent premier nylon fabric, and are completely sheer-to-waist. There is no finger band: Just a one-piece luxurious nylon yarn from waist to toe for complete evenness in fabric and shade.
We even improved the waistband, making it softer, flatter and more comfortable.
I fully realize that my vision for the perfect pantyhose may be worlds apart different than most people’s. I know Act IV aren’t for everyone.
All I can say is Act IV are everything I always wanted them to be. They are the product I dreamed of when I created ActSensuous 13 years ago, and I am proud to offer them to our devoted customers everywhere in the world.
Whenever I need expertise in a support area, I reach out to our customers first.
A longtime customer, Bridget, a professional graphic designer who owns her own studio, has done many projects for ActSensuous. She’s created some beautiful full-page ads for the program books that are handed out during the beauty pageants we sponsor.
Bridget also created the original artwork of various grizzly bears ripping up our pantyhose for my blog posts, “Why bears don’t wear pantyhose,” playing on my whole “bear” legs terminology. Bridget also designed the Act III packaging.
Another, relatively new customer, David, has contributed artwork to ActSensuous, too. David, also a professional graphic artist who owns his own business, M28create, (dmjdesigner.com), designed the Act IV packaging. It is the most beautiful and classy packaging we’ve ever used.
And, David gave me a great price — four pairs of Act IV for his wife, Sheri.
Then, he “volunteered” to design our new website. I was so excited about launching Act IV, I wanted a brand new website to usher it in.
I’m so glad David started when he did because it ended up taking him three months to finish, timing it perfectly with the arrival of Act IV.
After seeing the beautiful packaging design David produced, my thinking was that David would improve the look of the original site. I had no idea his thought was to create a full ecommerce website. I couldn’t understand how it was taking him so long, but I knew he was doing this mostly as a favor, and figured he was simultaneously working on other projects for actual paying customers.
Have you seen the new website? It is awesome.
I’m still learning how to use it. Finally, it gives us some control, as in the case of if/when we temporarily run out of a size in a particular color. Before, we had no way of alerting anyone in real time, meaning customers would order something we didn’t have, and then I’d have to tell them we were temporarily out, and make other arrangements or resolutions.
David is the total professional. He is easy to talk with, very patient and completely devoted to his work, sometimes staying up until 3 a.m. working on several sites at a time, and making a bunch of little adjustments every time I think of something new I want for mine. The guy is a saint.
My sincerest thanks to David for creating a website worthy of ushering in Act IV, and reflective of the commitment ActSensuous has to waging the good fight against the bear legs culture.
To our customers all over the world, I appreciate your positive and supportive comments about Act IV and our new website.
We’re all in this together, and together, we’ll bring pantyhose back to prominence.
With Chinese New Year only days away, the number 3 (a good one in Chinese culture) loomed large for professional tennis star Li Na, who on Saturday beat Slovakia’s Dominika Cibulkova 7-6 (3), 6-0 to claim the 2014 Australian Open women’s single’s title in Melbourne, Australia.
Now, Li Na is a two-time grand slam winner, having won the French Open title in 2011. And, at 31, she’s the oldest player to win the Australian Open.
How significant is the number 3 in Saturday’s final? It was Li’s third Australian Open final in three years, having lost to Kim Clijsters in 2011, and to Victoria Azarenka in 2013.
And, having won today, Li will now be ranked number 3 in the world, edging out Maria Sharapova.
Oh yeah, and TV coverage of the match started at 3 a.m. Saturday on ESPN. At least this match didn’t go to 3 sets. (In her two previous finals in Melbourne, Li lost in 3 sets, after winning the first set in both appearances.)
Saturday, Li, the highest ranking player (4) remaining in the tournament after the Big 3 (Serena Williams, Sharapova and Azarenka) were all knocked out by the end of the quarterfinals, was serving at set point before losing 3 straight points, sending the first set into a tiebreaker. Li won the tiebreaker 7-3 (see that, another 3).
Even though Li jumped out to a 2-0 lead in the opening set, it was pretty obvious she was battling nerves, as she committed 19 unforced errors just off her forehand. But while Cibulkova had dominated in her earlier matches, easily and boldly dispatching the likes of Sharapova and Agnieszka Radwanska, the Slovakian was feeling the pressure of playing in her first ever championship match.
And, even though she came into the match feeling confident she could win, she finally was facing someone she couldn’t push around.
On the contrary, she found herself dominated against Li who was able to easily push her around, even while Li struggled to find her rhythm.
The first set lasted 70 minutes, with both players alternating between great shots and missed opportunities, but once Li won the tiebreaker, she settled in and played her game, overwhelming Cibulkova en route to a 6-0 second set that lasted only 27 minutes.
This time, Li was dialed in, hitting forehand and backhand winners on the base line and both sidelines. She dropped only 4 points on serve.
After the match, Li was her usual charming and funny self, delivering an acceptance speech that had the stadium rocking with laughter, as she recognized each member of her team in almost roast-style fashion.
OK, enough of the sports writing. Time to treat this as a blog. My blog. My way.
And since this blog is about all things pantyhose, I must give props to WTA analyst and former World No. 1 professional tennis player Chris Evert (winner of 18 Grand Slam women’s singles titles) who not only did a great job calling the match along with Cliff Drysdale, but who presented the trophies to both players.
Chris surprised me, wearing a nice dress with high heels and sheer pantyhose. I say surprised because every time I’ve watched pregame commentary by the former female players/now analysts, they are dressed extremely casually on the set sometimes in dresses, but always “bear”-legged, even though their male counterparts are wearing suits and ties.
So I’m proud of Chris for dressing appropriately for the occasion, as I can’t imagine even one of the other big-name former champions/analysts would have worn heels and hose in that situation.
(I couldn’t find a picture of Chris in that outfit to show you here, but you can catch a glimpse of her in this video of the awards presentation.) http://tennis.si.com/2014/01/25/li-na-australian-open-victory-speech/
In case you’re wondering, there are three (get that, 3 again?) reasons I’m writing this post here:
First, I was encouraged by seeing that you’ve been reading the first post I wrote about Li Na when I “discovered” her in 2011 and became a fan.
Second, I am so happy she won a second grand slam, I can’t sit back and not write about her.
Third, unlike last time, this time, I actually have some pictures of Na wearing pantyhose. There’s the justification!
Still, this post will be different from what you’re used to getting from me. You might not want to read this one unless you’re a WTA fan, and particularly, a Li Na fan.
If you do read this one, at least you’ll get a different insight into who I am outside of ActSensuous.
And besides, I have enough pics of Li Na in pantyhose, I need to write a lot to have a place to fit the pictures in. So, if nothing else, you can just enjoy the pictures and move on without really reading all this.
How it started
I had only just started regularly watching The Tennis Channel on DirecTV, and I grew to like Jelena Jankovic. I thought JJ was very feminine and I liked her game. But I had been growing weary of her drama queen antics, and then happened to see a Li Na match. I had never heard of Li Na, even though she had been a professional on the WTA since 1999.
I wish I had been following tennis back then so I could have seen more Li Na matches. Next month, Na (going with her first name at this point in the post) will turn 32, so I don’t know how much longer she’ll be playing.
Anyway, I loved what I saw. Na is such a combination of grace, elegance, beauty (best legs in the WTA) and power. Amazing that the first few matches I saw were during Na’s road to winning the tuneup match prior to the 2011 Australian Open, in which she beat the likes of powerhouse Petra Kvitova and the ever dangerous Kim Clijsters. Then, she got to the final match of the Australian Open 2011, where she lost to Clijsters, but won an entire country with her charm and sense of humor during post match interviews.
Wow, I had a female tennis hero. I had been watching the ATP and was an Andrei Agassi fan, then after Agassi retired, I really started liking Roger Federer. But now, I was watching the WTA (Women’s Tennis Association) on The Tennis Channel to see Li Na play. She was an incredible shot-maker and a sharpshooter, painting the sidelines and baselines. Her style was all out, and when that wasn’t working, Plan B was to hit the ball even harder.
I fell in love with Li Na and was so happy and proud of her when she became the first Asian player in history to play in a final (that 2011 Australian Open).
Later, Na made history again when she became the first Asian player (man or woman) to win a grand slam event (the 2011 French Open).
But then everyone saw what happened to Na’s psyche once she gained rock star status in China, and a ton of pressure descended on her to do it again. That, combined with the added pressure of being among the highest paid athletes for sponsors, such as Nike, Mercedes, Haagen Daz, etc., saw her go through the 2012 season winning only one tournament (not a grand slam event) toward the end of the year.
It was difficult to watch Na in 2012 because she should have won so many matches that slipped away in the end because of the pressure, her nerves and a new-found doubt.
Enter new coach Carlos Rodriguez, former coach of Justine Henin, who struck up a partnership with Na. It would prove to be the best thing to happen for Li Na’s career, as he took immediate steps to adjust Na’s game. And, perhaps, more importantly, her psyche.
Rodriguez put Na through a training regimen that would have challenged Navy SEALS. Then, he worked on her forehand and her serve. All the TV analysts love to talk about how Na’s forehand is the first part of her game to break down. They do say her backhand is the best in the game, but, oh, that forehand. Alright, already. I love Na’s forehand.
When she is in the zone, that forehand cross court shot is devastating. And I’ve seen her win a great many points with tat forehand. But, in all fairness, Rodriguez did reign it in a bit by getting Na to add a little top spin to control it.
Also, thankfully, Rodriguez changed Na’s service motion, which has added a little more power and consistency to it, and lately, that serve has been winning her some free points, or setting the tone for her to take charge of the point from the start.
But the biggest thing is Rodriguez has really worked to improve Na’s emotions. I knew Na needed an infusion of confidence, but I hadn’t realized how bad things had gotten for her until Saturday when the analysts pointed out that Na earlier confided in Rodriguez that, while so many others believed in her, she didn’t truly believe in herself.
Apparently, all the years she played tennis (started at 8 years old and turned pro at 16), she never got a single compliment about her tennis from any coach in China. That, along with her almost overnight star power caused Na much stress, as the expectations of an adoring world made it more and more difficult for her to focus during tennis matches.
Rodriguez may be the best coach Li could have, as he has spent a great deal of time reassuring Na and teaching her how to keep her composure during a match, and to forgive herself when she makes a bad shot, as part of the problem is Na is very hard on herself.
OK, there’s one other reason I am writing this post about Li Na, and if you’re looking for a place to bail out of this post, here it is. (I’d stop reading if I were you.)
Then again, this is where you’ll see a slightly different side of me.
This time last year, Na was in position to win the 2013 Australian Open.
Because I am a DirecTV subscriber and have the Tennis Channel, I was able to see every match Na played in the 2013 Australian Open. She looked so much more powerful and confident.
But I was concerned when Na had to play Agneiszka Radwanska in the quarterfinal match. Radwanska, at that time, was undefeated in 2013 and hadn’t dropped a single set on the year.
That match, I thought, would tell me whether Na was ready to contend for another championship title.
I was excited but nervous when Na won a tight first set, 7-5, Radwanska’s first loss in something like 26 or 28 sets I think. But then, Na dominated in the second set, winning it 6-3. I was starting to believe, yet, I still wondered whether Na could carry that over against Maria Sharapova in the semifinal match next.
OK, here’s that side you haven’t seen of me before:
Sharapova — or as I like to call her, “Shriek-a-pova” (because she’s the second-most annoying player of the WTA with that loud, obnoxious war cry on every single shot), had lost only nine games during the Australian Open heading into the match against Li. But Na destroyed Shriekapova in straight sets 6-2, 6-2. To me, Na looked ready to capture her second Grand Slam championship, and because this was the Australian Open, I thought it could actually happen.
In the final, Na would face Azarenka, THE most annoying player of the WTA. I hate Azarenka (whom I call Ass-a-renka since she makes an ass out of herself with that stupid shriek of her’s on every single shot, including her serve), only slightly more than I hate Shriekapova.
So, that Friday night 2013, I couldn’t sleep. And on Saturday morning, I watched, I cheered for Na, I spoke to Na through the TV, encouraging her every step of the way. And when Na took the first set 6-4 (she could have/should have won it 6-2), I was feeling good.
And even when Assarenka went up 3-0 in the second set, I didn’t panic. I know Na can overcome 0-3. And, I figured if this went to three sets, it favored Na because she’s the better mover, her conditioning is better, and, hey, it’s the Australian Open. I loved how 90 percent of the crowd was for Na. In fact, as the match went on and Assarenka got nastier and nastier, I couldn’t believe anyone other than her coach and her boyfriend, Bozo the Clown, could possibly cheer for her.
But secretly, I was worried. As much as she disgusts me, I have to say that Assarenka is tough. She seems perfectly comfortable being the bad guy, and I was afraid the hostile crowd that cheered voraciously every time Assarenka missed a shot, and booed her every time she had words with the chair umpire or slapped a ball down the court after making an error, might backfire by making her more determined. I was also a bit concerned that the overwhelming support for Li might creep into Na’s psyche. Who knows how these things work?
Turn for the worst
As I knew she would, Na overcame the 0-3 start in the second set, but I was stunned and extremely upset to see my hero roll her left ankle and fall.
The pain on her face scared me, especially, when she couldn’t put any weight on her leg. Along with the estimated 20,000 spectators who sat in stunned silence, I couldn’t believe what I was seeing.
But I know Li Na is tough, and I was not surprised when, after the tournament training staff wrapped her ankle, she was able to continue. She even leveled the set at 4-4. And when she eventually lost that second set 4-6, I still believed she would win the third set and claim the trophy.
But with Na ahead in the third and final set 2-1, a scheduled fireworks show to commemorate Australia Day delayed play for 9 minutes. I sensed a bad omen: It was a momentum-killer and it forced Li to sit in the cold night air (Australia time), which was not good for her swollen ankle.
And, sure enough, after play resumed, and during the first point, Na rolled the same ankle while chasing a shot wide to her backhand side.
This was almost unbelievable to me and the capacity crowd, but worse, this time, the fall caused Li to smack the back of her head hard on the court. My heart sank. Only this time, I wasn’t worried about the match — I was worried about Na.
Along with the crowd, I gasped at the site during the many replays. Everyone sat in disbelief and stunned silence as doctors rushed on to the court to evaluate Li.
And then it happened. During the concussion test, Na, in her ever-endearing style, seemingly embarrassed over all the attention, broke into laughter. Later, she said during an interview she thought it was funny that this was happening on a tennis court and not in a hospital.
But when she laughed, the crowd broke out into laughter too. It made me laugh and cry at the same time. Na is such a sweetheart, such a good sport, such a great person. What a little angel. She said that for a couple of seconds she lost her vision. It was a scary moment, but here she was lightening the moment with her cute personality, once again filling the crowd with a sense of awe for this magnificent, yet, humble and all too human a champion.
So many factors were working against Li Na. The cool weather after it had been so hot for most of the tournament, the falls (the first in her professional career), the 9-minute delay of the match for the fireworks show, the overwhelming support of the crowd, all combined to doom Li Na’s chances to win her second Grand Slam event. I wanted it for her so badly because I believed it would validate her, and restore her confidence once and for all. And because the Australian Open is her Grand Slam tournament. It her favorite event, and Li Na is so loved by most everyone there.
As it turned out, Li Na did what she always does – she was gracious, she was cute and funny. She joked about falling, saying it was “Because I’m stupid.” She vowed to be back better than ever.
But the ankle injury was more serious than anyone knew, and it took longer than expected for Na to return. She missed a lot of tennis, and when she did come back, she played well, but didn’t win much the rest of the year.
So, it’s last night Jan. 24, 2014 and Li Na is a finalist again in the Australian Open. It seems like there is justice in sports that Na has another chance to win grand slam event she covets most. The match would be aired at 3:30 a.m. today (Saturday). I thought about going to sleep and recording the match on my DVR so I could watch later and just blow through the commercials.
But who was I kidding? I wasn’t going to be able to sleep. Besides, I wanted to be there for every second of the match. I wanted to be part of each point, talking to the TV, cheering after each winning rally and encouraging Na after each lost point.
I am her devoted fan. I couldn’t not watch her match in real time. I didn’t want the result to already have happened without me there to help.
My stomach was in knots at 3 a.m. I wish I had known then about the good fortune that is the number 3 in Chinese culture. It might have helped me relax a little.
Chinese tradition considers 3 a lucky number. Three has its origin in Confucianism and Taoism. It stands for Heaven, Earth and Human being; philosophically, Tao means the amiableness among the above three elements. http://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/lucky-number3.htm
The number 3 is considered a lucky number in Chinese culture. The number 3 is significant since there are three important stages in a man’s life (birth, marriage and death). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_in_Chinese_culture
In Mandarin, Number 3 sounds like the word, life, so it is considered a good number. http://www.chinese-traditions-and-culture.com/chinese-lucky-numbers.html
A charming New Year?
“Legend has it that in ancient times, Buddha asked all the animals to meet him on Chinese New Year. Twelve came, and Buddha named a year after each one. He announced that the people born in each animal’s year would have some of that animal’s personality.
(Chinese New Year begins Friday Jan. 31, 2014 — the year of the horse.)
“Those born in horse years are cheerful, skillful with money, perceptive, witty, talented and good with their hands.”
We know Li Na is all of those things, especially, witty and good with a tennis racket in her hands.
Happy Chinese New Year, Li Na .
I hope you win the next three slams this year (French Open, Wimbledon and US Open).
Either way, at least you won the one you were made to win – the Australian Open.
Congratulations, Li Na.
A few of the models from my friends over at PantyHoseClass.com test drove our brand new line, Act IV, recently, while decorating for Christmas.
All of the models at PantyHoseClass.com are real girls who are in college and/or have real jobs.
They are all young ladies who just love pantyhose.
A few of them, Leilani, Olivia and Ariel, couldn’t wait to try the new Act IV and give me their feedback, while we are still in the R&D stages.
Leilani, 23, is a college student who enjoys blogging her fashions and looking for new fashion blog sites.
She has always loved pantyhose, saying they are a part of who she is.
To put herself through college, Leilani is a hostess at one of the most affluent restaurants in her city.
“I have become a popular hostess at the restaurant because I wear a skirt or dress every day with pantyhose,” Leilana says. “I never wear pants or go bare-legged.
“I wear tights a lot and shiny pantyhose, so Act IV are a great change in look and feel for me.”
Olivia, 22, works in a medical office during the day and is a bartender by night.
She says she loves pantyhose because of the professional look they give her, and she loves how they feel.
Olivia, who says her hobbies are hitting the stores to find perfect clothes and going shoe shopping, says she wears pantyhose every day and even sleeps in them.
“I love Act IV because they are so light and sheer,” Olivia says. “They give the look of bare legs, but the secure feeling of pantyhose.”
Ariel, 19, is Olivia’s sister. She always enjoyed seeing her big sis modeling pantyhose, and said she couldn’t wait until she turned 18 so she could start modeling, too.
An assistant manager at a clothing store, Ariel says she loves to show off her legs, and she feels that pantyhose or tights are essential.
To that end, the horror movie fan says she wears pantyhose six days a week. Wow. Ariel is my kind of girl.
“Act IV pantyhose are very sheer and delicate,” Ariel says. “They look and feel like you’re not wearing pantyhose, but they make your legs look so good.”
My thanks to Leilani, Olivia and Ariel for trying out our brand new Act IV. Now, here they are making Act IV look good:
Since the “bear”-legs culture first reared its ugly head during the mid-to-late 1990s, women the world over have been trying to permanently run pantyhose out of town.
(If you’re new here and wonder about my use of the word, “bear” instead of bare, see my explanation in the About Me section.)
But during all this time, the fashion accessory — once the staple of female professionalism, class, glamour, femininity and just plain good taste — has showed a remarkable resilience that would belie its otherwise delicate nature.
Launch an Internet search for pantyhose and you can see that not only are nylons still relevant today, but, in fact, they appear to be growing more and more popular every day. There must be thousands of websites devoted to women wearing pantyhose, and the men who love them.
And if you want to see celebrities from every corner of the planet wearing pantyhose, there are dozens of websites featuring millions of pictures devoted to that subject. In fact, it is more difficult to find a celebrity today who isn’t wearing pantyhose in at least a few pictures. Seeing this, one might actually think there never was a bear-legs movement.
In this blog, my column, Credit “Wear” Credit is Due has glorified many celebs who could be considered devoted pantyhose wearers. But here’s the thing: Each one I’ve praised has let me down one time or another, going bear-legged during appearances that I would have thought were the perfect venues for wearing pantyhose.
Of course, there are some celebs, such as Sofia Vergara, Nicole Kidman, Anne Hathaway, and Zooey Deschanel, who are consistent pantyhose wearers; and some who are frequent wearers even just out-and-about (Paris Hilton comes to mind). Nevertheless, the vast majority of celebs, including the aforementioned, more often than not appear bear-legged on late night talk shows and awards ceremonies.
Similarly, there are many veteran singers/dancers who almost always wear pantyhose on stage (Madonna, Cher, Beyonce’, Jennifer Lopez), just as there are many young, rising stars (Katy Perry, Rihanna, Selena Gomez, Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande) whom we’ve come to expect to see in pantyhose during such events.
And among that group, I’ve observed that Ariana Grande is the most dedicated pantyhose-wearer. And, as she is only 20 years old, I could not be more impressed with her. And grateful to her.
And I love her for being a shining example for her legion of young fans in always dressing beautifully, including wearing sheer suntan pantyhose.
From this, we can conclude that these performers are professional (and maybe classy) enough to wear pantyhose on stage, realizing their legs look better under the lights.
So how in the world do some of these superstars show up to receive awards, such as during Sunday night’s American Music Awards (AMA) presentation, wearing gorgeous gowns and stilettos, yet, with bear legs?
I don’t get it. These stars mostly are consistent pantyhose-wearers when performing concerts and often when making publicity appearances (Selena Gomez, Taylor Swift, Rihanna), then, on what should be the most special night of their careers — a night where they are recognized for their achievments among their peers and before a national television audience — they almost to a woman attend bear-legged.
Here’s what I don’t understand: They seem to recognize that this special night calls for the most expensive designer dresses, fabulous jewelry and amazing shoes. But pantyhose? Nah!
I present this as the first snag in the comeback of pantyhose because for all the steps forward we take when celebs wear during performances, it’s like a huge step backward when all of them gather on one stage at one time for such a significant event, and practically no one wears.
Incidentally, I didn’t watch the AMAs. Instead, I was watching Sunday Night Football and recording The Good Wife. So on commercials, I’d check in on the AMAs. I was happy for Taylor Swift, winning awards for Artist of the Year, Favorite Pop/Rock Female Artist, Favorite Country Female Artist, and Favorite Country Album.
Taylor is one of the young stars who more often than not wears sheer nude pantyhose on stage, and frequently wears when she’s out-and-about.
I couldn’t wait to see what she’d wear during the AMAs. Then, I saw. Her dress wasn’t all that fancy, but it was nice. And it was super short. And I liked her high heel dress sandals.
But how could she not wear pantyhose with this outfit, for this event?
Similarly, Rihanna is extremely likely to wear pantyhose on stage with all kinds of outfits from elegant to exotic to what the what?
And, she’s frequently seen wearing pantyhose during public appearances.
Like Taylor, I fully expected to see Rihanna (Favorite Soul/R&B Female Artist award) standing out from the herd (all disrespect fully intended) during the AMAs. Nope!
Then, there was my new fave: Sweet, innocent, adorable little Ariana Grande, who wore the most beautiful and elegant gown of any of them.
It was floor length, but when she climbed the steps up to the stage to accept the New Artist of the Year award, I noticed she indeed was wearing her trademark sheer suntan pantyhose.
I am so happy that Ariana won New Artist of the Year.
I also happened to check in on the AMAs in time to see Lady Gaga’s performance of “Do what you want with my body,” and that’s about all I want to say on that subject. Other than that I think that song and performance was just another example of the all-too-many just like it that glamourize a lack of values in society today.
The only reason I bring up the performance at all is because Lady Gaga did wear her signature nude fishnet pantyhose with her outfit. Since I’m complaining that almost no one did Sunday night, I have to point out that Lady Gaga did. Nuff said about her though.
What I loved was the performance I happened to catch by Jennifer Lopez. Now, J Lo knows how to put on a show, belting out some great vocals and high-energy salsa dance moves in three different outfits (all accessorized with suntan fishnet pantyhose).
In addition to celebs opting for bear legs during awards shows and other venues, those dreaded so-called fashion experts still are waging war on pantyhose. Granted, we don’t hear as much from them today as we did during the late 90s to most of the decade of 2000. But they’re still out there.
Of course, I never read fashion magazines or websites, and I couldn’t care less what their so-called experts think, but when I noticed last month a picture of one of my favorite actresses wearing a cute outfit, I clicked on it, only to be taken to an online fashion site, which I found was actually putting her down.
Here’s the picture of Taiwanese actress Shu Qi.
She is an extremely popular model and actress throughout China. Her first English speaking role came in the movie, The Transporter, in which she co-starred (very delightfully) with Jason Statham.
Shu is adorable and extremely professional and classy, almost always appearing in pantyhose on stage and during publicity appearances.
But the online website RCFA (Red Carpet Fashion Awards) last month slammed Shu for wearing nude tights with her outfit during an appearance at a Jimmy Choo accessories store opening ceremony in Hong Kong.
The author of RCFA, Catherine Kallon, wrote:
“The actress’ Jimmy Choo accessories included a crystal-accented ‘Charlize’ clutch and ‘Anouk’ pointy pumps as expected; however, the same can’t be said for her dress.
“On this occasion, the usually conservative star wore a Calla Spring 2013 printed frock with a gauze sheer insert at the waist.
“It’s a cute, fun, flirty look, but the dress doesn’t sit as well as it does on the model … I could’ve overlooked most of the flaws to give Shu a pass for stepping outside the box, but why oh why is she wearing nude tights? (I added the bold to highlight my point.)
“And what’s up with the Paris Hilton pose?”
OK, first, Kallon thinks the outfit looks better on the model in the pic left of Shu Qi? Uh … I don’t think so. Second, I’d like to kick Kallon’s you know what. OK, OK, I’m not really like that, but …
I think Shu looks absolutely adorable in this outfit, and even though I’m not a fan of shiny tights (as my love is sheer nude pantyhose), I think Shu absolutely rocks in them.
And, another thing: While Shu Qi typically does dress professionally, elegantly and beautifully, I wouldn’t necessarily call it conservatively, as Kallon does. Certainly, I love that Shu has the class and good taste to most-often wear sheer pantyhose, but if Kallon and her readers think the tights she wore at Jimmy Choo’s are an eyesore, they haven’t seen anything. Shu has been known to wear some pretty exotic-looking pantyhose and tights during publicity events, as you’ll see later in this post.
Besides, Kallon’s stupid remarks, her post generated 23 comments, one of which was:
The dress is too young, cutesy and girly for her and sits awkwardly on her to begin with, a very wrong choice for her, the nude tights are an eyesore and bring the look down completely.
OK, I really do want to kick Nat39’s a$$. Oh, and Nat, know what a run-on sentence is? You’ve got about three sentences all rolled into one there. Hey, good job with that.
Worse, it seemed (I’m not sure because I stopped reading, as my blood pressure was starting to soar) that all 23 comments were in support of Kallon’s opinion.
Well, I can live with an idiot “fashion expert” dissing a lovely celebrity once, but recently, I stumbled across another post by Kallon (written last year), this time putting down Megan Fox. Seriously, Megan Fox.
Kallon posted this pic of a model wearing an outfit she liked, and contrasted it with the same look on Megan Fox, disapproving because Megan had the class to wear it with pantyhose.
Now, you decide. Who looks better, the model or Megan?
Here’s what Kallon wrote:
“Getting up for the 5am Golden Globe Awards nominations announcement this morning would’ve been easy for Megan Fox, considering she’s probably used to being up at that ungodly hour with her newborn.
“… Megan also opted for a lady-like look. Clearly the new mum is putting her sassy days behind her.
“She wore a beautiful floral Giambattista Valli Resort 2013 dress with an ivory top and moss-green skirt which she styled with nude platform Louboutins.
“This is a great look for Megan. I couldn’t be more envious of her hair, but those nude fishnet tights are jarring.” (I added the bold to highlight my point.)
What’s next, Kallon? You going to criticize your countrywoman, Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton, for wearing sheer nude pantyhose? Unbelievable.
Now, if you can’t fathom how a site like RCFA could be so demeaning to superstar celebrities for wearing pantyhose, here’s another one for you:
The Fashionable Teacher Grading Red Carpet Fashions Everywhere. Are you an A+ or a Fashion Fail.
This site is run by mochababe73.
In this case, The Fashionable Teacher didn’t like an outfit Jennifer Hudson wore to a movie premiere in April of this year. Here’s the picture.
Here’s what mochababe73 wrote:
“Jennifer Hudson really stood out from the crowd.
“And, not in a good way. This Emmanuel Ungaro dress was really, really busy. The animal print and polka dots have no business being in the same dress, and it’s wrong on so many levels. The two prints together are just and assault to the eyes.
On top of that, the white cuffs, gold details, and visible bra just add to the carnage.
“Love the Saint Laurent shoes, but what’s with the pantyhose?”
Well, for starters, they represent professionalism and class, mochababe73. And, like makeup, pantyhose greatly beautify the look of a woman’s legs, mochababe73.
Great, another “fashion expert” who knocks a celebrity for having the good sense and class to wear pantyhose with her outfit.
I decided to look for other pics of Jennifer Hudson wearing pantyhose. Unfortunately, I found only two. Of course I don’t think that the negative comments of mochababe73 on her website influenced Jennifer to not wear pantyhose.
I do think it’s a shame that those who don’t have professionalism or class, use their forum as “fashion experts” to criticize celebs who do.
I guess the pic of Jennifer (at right) in the red dress with “bear” legs represents the look that mochababe73 finds more appropriate?
Here’s the author’s profile:
Houston, TX baby!
I am a wife and mother. I am a teacher. And, I am one wife, mother, and teacher who devours fashion. My fashion magazine collection is insane.
Hey, mochababe73, you’re a teacher? Shouldn’t you end that last part of your tagline with a question mark, not a period? You have: Are you an A+ or a Fashion Fail. It should read: Are you an A+ or a Fashion Fail?
More ‘expert’ advice
Finally, it still amazes me that anyone really listens to these so-called fashion experts. I am always amused when I see an online post from a woman asking for advice about what she should or shouldn’t wear to a function.
A frequent question is “Can I wear pantyhose with open-toe dress shoes?” And all the “experts” jump on that one like vultures on road pizza. Naturally, they all attempt to talk women out of committing such a fashion no-no, and I always love how NO ONE ever follows their advice.
It remains one of the dumbest things these “fashion experts” wax on about.
Fortunately, no one’s listening.
Look at this picture of beautiful Chinese actress Cecilia Cheung. What could possibly be wrong with her wearing sheer pantyhose with these peep-toe heels? She has perfect toes that look all the more gorgeous under those deliciously sheer nylons.
Perhaps, there will always be a few snags that slightly delay the return of pantyhose to favor.
Still, it is so wonderful that we see cases every day in which celebrities and everyday women throughout the world chose the class, elegance and femininity that comes with wearing pantyhose.
Now, here are some of my favorite pics of Shu Qi wearing a wide variety of pantyhose and tights styles:
Being in biz since 2001, ActSensuous has several hundred customers occupying every corner of the planet. And from every walk of life.
We have doctors, doctors who are also part-time ballroom dancers, lawyers, teachers, musicians, authors, motivational speakers. Even a spy, (but don’t tell anyone).
One new customer is a lifelong pantyhose lover who found us by chance. Seems one of her clients is one of our customers … who was buying our pantyhose … to give to her … to wear for him.
Intrigued? I was. But I didn’t ask. I am not judgmental, and I don’t care what anyone does with our pantyhose once they own them. But once she began ordering from us on her own, she contacted me to introduce herself.
So, in keeping with one of this blog’s favorite themes — “Real girls in pantyhose” — let me introduce Madam Sofie.
“I wear a lot of hosiery because I love the look and feel,” Madam Sofie told me. “But my story is I wear pantyhose for others. Perhaps you’ve heard of the ‘well worn’ side of the fetish.”
She had me at “fetish.”
“I wear them for men who are into the fetish,” Madam Sofie said. “So I sell fantasies, if you will. But with class. I respect hosiery and always keep it classy. All my pictures are classy — dressed, hosiery, high heels. The complete look.”
By day, Sofie is more of a conservative professional, an entrepreneur, running her own consulting business, highly involved in day-to-day operations of her clients. With a bachelors degree in Business, she is diverse in employee relations, accounting, payroll, etc.
She looks like the perfect girl next door.
But, at night, she changes into her sassy alter ego, hosting an online business, in which Madam Sofie creates and plays out pantyhose fantasies on demand.
“I dress up and wear different brands, styles and colors of pantyhose for men who most often are submissive to women,” Madam Sofie said. “Pantyhose fetish is a big part of foot fetish, thus, my own love for high heels and pantyhose makes me very unique.
“I know what makes men weak in their knees, and Madam Sofie does that with just one shoe dangle.”
Nearly a year old now (she started the online business in November 2012), the Madam Sofie persona came to her by chance.
A stranger asked her to wear a pair of pantyhose for him, and that made her confront the realization of just how much she really enjoys wearing hosiery, and come to grips with just how that captivates men.
“I came to realize it was a big fetish online. It piqued my interest. Just out of curiosity, I listed a pair of my worn pantyhose on an online auction site, and practically overnight, my own curiosity grew into an online lifestyle.”
Today, Madam Sofie is a thriving online business, which is providing a valued service to dozens of men all over the world. And they all have one thing in common:
“I get a lot of different requests for hosiery,” Madam Sofie said. “All requests are custom-prepared and I can honestly say that I have heard it all by now. I am open to any requests, but as I always say, I keep it ‘Classy, but with a pinch of sassy.’ ”
Are pantyhose a requirement of the job, I wanted to know? Not really, Madam Sofie said, as she is her own boss, and can do whatever she wants. But she chooses to wear pantyhose, and that remains the genre’ of her business.
“I love the soft, silky feel, as well as the polished look pantyhose offer.”
For Sofie, her love affair with pantyhose began at an early age, as she grew up seeing women wearing them.
She always considered pantyhose a very classy and feminine look, and she began wearing them during her high school days.
And she never stopped.
“I have been wearing pantyhose my entire adult life,” Sofie said. “I cannot imagine not wearing them. On average, there are five to seven pairs that I have on hand on any given day.
“I enjoy the comfortable softness against my skin, and I especially like the sheer look.”
But one of the things I love about Sofie, and the reason she is featured here, is she’s not only professional and classy enough to wear pantyhose for business reasons, she also practically lives in them during her everyday personal life?
“I wear pantyhose on a daily basis for business and for casual looks,” Sofie said.
“Even if I am in jeans or shorts, I have pantyhose on. There’s not one outfit that cannot be topped off with a pair of pantyhose.”
Wow, is she a dream girl or what, guys?
I asked whether men notice her more when she is wearing pantyhose than when she isn’t?
“Men definitely notice me more in pantyhose, and surprisingly, it is not just the older men, but younger men also appreciate the classy look,” she said. “I get compliments all the time. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that I always wear pantyhose with high heels and have quite a collection of both.
“I cannot imagine ever having a boyfriend or husband who didn’t appreciate me for wearing pantyhose, as it’s such a big part of my life. I would not change my style, as I don’t think I need any improvement.”
OK, well, what about other females Sofie encounters during her normal day? I wondered whether any of them ask her why she wears pantyhose, or try to discourage her from doing so?
“I have recruited many of my friends into my passion for pantyhose, and they do not need to be encouraged further after they realize that sheer pantyhose are perceived as feminine, classy and sexy,” Sofie said.
“I feel truly sorry for women who do not wear pantyhose. They don’t realize that their appearance improves dramatically, people treat you differently, doors open that wouldn’t otherwise, as pantyhose give a polished, confident look.”
Getting to know her
Age: Late 20s
Weight: 110 pounds
Dress size: 00
Shoe size: 6.5
Pantyhose size: B
Where from: Europe
Heroes: All strong character women. We truly do make this world spin on a daily basis.
Favorite female celebrities: Ingrid Bergman. Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walked into Rick’s place in Casablanca! Lucky us. Aretha Franklin for properly defining RESPECT. Any Bond Girl. Who doesn’t admire a girl who looks great in a bikini and can handle a gun?
Hobbies/interests: Shooting my guns at the range and being able to take them down and clean them afterward. I am very athletic and spend hours at the gym each week. I love cycling, competing in timed circuits and running.
Values: Honesty is the most important value. If you cannot trust someone, there can be no relationship. It’s important to be yourself and to admit your own mistakes because that not only builds trust for you in others, but unless you can own up to your own mistakes, you are likely to repeat them.
Most proud of: I wouldn’t call it my greatest accomplishment, but I’m very proud of myself about being self-efficient and being able to help those around me. I support various local charities and especially St. Jude’s Childrens’ Hospital.
What’s on your iPod: Absolutely nothing. I hardly have any time to listen to music. Although I do enjoy all genres except Country.
Favorite book: Agatha Christie’s “Hercule” (Detective Hercule Poirot series)
Favorite movie all-time: “Wizard of Oz”
Favorite color: I love all colors
Any pets: Only human
Sofie feels today’s “bare-legs culture” is a reflection of people’s “cheaper, faster, more casual” way of living. While she understands that point of view, Sofie believes that women should at least still wear pantyhose for nights out, and that it’s a must-wear situation in the business environment.
“I can’t imagine not wearing pantyhose to any professional appointment. Without pantyhose, that all-important first impression may well be the last one you get a chance to make.”
After all, it was that first impression of her wearing pantyhose that led to a stranger asking her to wear for him, and that worked out pretty well.
“I love meeting and interacting with people who share a common interest in my pantyhose/foot fetish,” Madam Sofie said. “I have made many friends over the course of almost a year now.“I really enjoy my ‘pets/slaves’ for their individualities, and respect them for who they are in and out of the fetish.”If you’d like to contact Madam Sofie with a proposal for having her fulfill your pantyhose fetish fantasies, you can send her an email message at firstname.lastname@example.orgJust remember, first and foremost, she is a classy girl. Please respect that.
Meanwhile, you can start with this gallery of Madam Sofie modeling some of her favorite styles and shades of ActSensuous pantyhose.
Many thanks to Madam Sofie for sharing a glimpse of her world with us.
UPDATE — Thursday Sept. 26, 2013:
OK, well, that was rather anti-climatic. Not only were there very few scenes of Lucy Liu wearing sheer nude pantyhose during tonight’s Season 2 premiere episode of “Elementary,” but no real great camera views.
Nevertheless, it doesn’t change the fact that Lucy Liu actually did wear sheer nude pantyhose for (the first time ever on the show?), and at least we have the still shots to enjoy what we didn’t get to see enough of during the actual episode.
Original post — Tuesday Sept. 24, 2013:
I know that at least some of you are like me (so sorry for that) in that you make decisions about which movies or TV shows you watch based on the likelihood of the female lead character wearing pantyhose.
Being a huge Lucy Liu fan, I have tried to watch the CBS reimagined Sherlock Holmes TV drama series, “Elementary,” in which she plays Dr. Joan Watson — a sober companion-turned-apprentice-detective to Holmes.
While I love Lucy Liu and think she’s a fine actress, I haven’t been able to stick with Elementary for two reasons:
First, she has too much of a backseat role for my liking; Second, I don’t care for her wardrobe (usually, some fluffy skirt, with ankle booties and thick, dark tights; sometimes, slightly not as thick and lighter-colored tights, but always the tights). Tights! Tights! Always, the tights.
This also appears to be Lucy Liu’s preferred real-life look — or worse, not with the tights even, as she all-too-often does the “bear” legs thing.
That’s a shame because when she occasionally dresses elegantly, and when she extremely rarely wears sheer pantyhose, Lucy Liu looks absolutely spectacular.
A sheer miracle
Now, something earth-shattering is about to happen. In this Thursday’s (Sept. 26) Season 2, Episode 1 premiere of Elementary at 10 p.m. on CBS, Dr. Watson is going to be wearing a fluffy dress, those goofy ankle booties and … wait for it … SHEER NUDE PANTYHOSE.
In the episode, “Step Nine:” Holmes and Watson travel to London to help a former mentor of Holmes’ investigate an unsolved mystery.
Now, since the show is on Thursday, I don’t know the details, but I was fortunate enough to find some pics from the scenes, which were shot last month. It’s a bit confusing because Watson is wearing two similar-looking outfits, one in New York, where the show is set, and the other during the London scenes.
During the scenes shot in NY, Watson is “bear”-legged, but while in London, she wears sheer nude pantyhose. Hmmmmm.
Two things here: First, most of the outfits Watson wears at least include tights, so why she appears out in the streets of NY in bear legs actually surprises me; Second, the fact that she wears pantyhose while in London is very interesting.
Is this a sign of respect directed toward Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, while on Kate’s turf? After all, it was Kate Middleton who almost single-handedly brought back, not only pantyhose, but more specifically, sheer nude or suntan pantyhose, to mostly the whole world. (Thanks again for that, Kate.)
And if this is a sign of respect, was it the decision of the costume designer of Elementary, or was it Lucy Liu’s decision or suggestion herself?
Either way, I’m happy, but I’d like to think that Lucy Liu wanted to wear sheer nude pantyhose.
Again, since we won’t see the show until Thursday, I don’t know how the bear legs outfit and the sheer nude pantyhose outfit are worn during the same episode. It sounds as if the show begins with Holmes and Watson traveling to London, so I don’t know whether the NY scenes come up first, or if it is after the characters’ return home, or perhaps, the NY scenes are in the following week in Epsidode 2.
Either way, it appears that the photos from both NY and London were shot around the same time last month. Well, we’ll see, but the thing that is particularly significant here is that this episode, or episodes will serve as a wonderful compare/contrast deal.
To actually have the opportunity of the whole Elementary-viewing public to see for themselves and compare/contrast Watson’s bear legs with pantyhose-adorned legs in one episode (or two), is fantastic.
And what a tremendous difference there is.
When I wrote earlier that I want it to have been Lucy Liu’s decision that she wear pantyhose for the London scenes, it’s because I hope that she didn’t care much for the way her legs look in the NY scenes. Do you realize the significance of that?
How many times have you read my words on this blog, expressing my dismay at how a celebrity could see herself on camera after going bear-legged and not say to herself afterward: “What was I thinking?”
Whether that happened in Lucy Liu’s case or not, Elementary has just gotten a great deal more interesting and appealing to me.
OK, I feel some of you slipping away. What’s the big deal whether she wears pantyhose or not, you ask?
Listen, I love Lucy Liu. I think she is an incredibly beautiful lady. And I think she’s beautiful whether she’s wearing pantyhose or not.
Check out those legs.
I adore Lucy Liu, and I think she’s got some world-class legs.
But, after seeing this picture of herself, do you really believe Lucy Liu would be happy with how she looked in this short a skirt … and bear legs?
It doesn’t mean she’s not still beautiful. It doesn’t mean she isn’t a wonderful actress and a great person.
So for those who wonder why it matters, this is why: Do you think Lucy Liu would go without makeup during a TV episode or a movie?
I doubt it. She’s a superstar. She’s always going to present herself in the best possible light.
And, just as makeup can improve every actor’s face, sheer pantyhose can enhance the beauty of every girl’s legs.
I’m not saying Lucy Liu should never go bear-legged. I am saying that when she wears sheer nude (or any skin tone shade) pantyhose, she goes from beautiful to incredibly amazing. That’s all.
Make a difference
Now, here’s where you come in. Here’s your homework assignment. Whether you’re a Lucy Liu fan or not; whether you like Elementary or not, you should tune in Thursday at 10 p.m. on CBS and watch this episode.
Let’s make the ratings skyrocket at least for this episode. Will that make a difference? Would anyone associated with the show realize that people watched because Dr. Watson finally wears sheer nude pantyhose on Elementary? Probably not, but it couldn’t hurt.
Maybe those of you who are Internet savvy will write in to the show, lauding Lucy Liu’s and/or the costume designer’s decision to dress Watson this way.
If nothing else, the sharp contrast between Lucy Liu’s bear legs and pantyhose-graced legs will be permanently preserved on filmprint for critical scrutiny. If anyone really cares. I do, and I know you do, too.
As of this writing, of the 45 votes you cast, 17 were for Lucy Liu (38%). The next highest vote-getters were Tia Carrere with 10 (22%), followed by Zhang Ziyi (my personal favorite) with 9 (20%). And the field included some other very impressive candidates.
Actually, I’m shocked that Gong Li got no votes. She looks amazing in pantyhose, but sadly, you won’t find many pics of her in them. One exception is in her role in the “Miami Vice” movie.
In any event, at least for one episode of Elementary, we get to see Lucy Liu in sheer nude pantyhose, and suddenly, all seems right in the world. I hope it leads to many more episodes in which she dresses this way.
We’ve been waitin’ all (off season) for Sunday Night.
Well, it’s back! And tonight features the Week 1 opening of the 2013 NFL season on Sunday night, as the New York Giants are taking on the Dallas Cowboys right now at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas.
So, the good news is the NFL is back.
The bad news for me and fans of this blog is country music singer/songwriter Carrie Underwood made her debut as the new voice and face (OK, legs) of NBC’s Sunday Night Football theme song, “Waiting All Day for Sunday Night,” to what was estimated to be 25 million viewers.
Or, wait, was that actually Carrie Bradshaw of “Sex and the City,” prancing on stage in those “bear” legs?
“Obviously, we wanted to make it sound like me,” Underwood said of her new version of the theme song that Faith Hill had performed the past six seasons, “but we definitely wanted to bring a fun edge to it.”
I do like Underwood’s sound better, but it would have been nice if she had given the performance a new look, too — a little class by wearing sheer pantyhose with those short-shorts. But like Hill before her, Underwood must think that the $30 billion business the NFL is (wiki.answers.com) calls for a casual look on stage.
Underwood wore dark blueish/blackish denim short-shorts, a dark blue tank top and dark blueish/blackish cowboy boots. And, unfortunately, bear legs. [Note: I use quote marks on only the first reference to bear legs — my way of making fun of today's bare legs culture.]
I guess you can take the bumpkin out of the country, but you can’t take the country out of the bumpkin.
Somewhere, Hill must be smiling.
I was afraid Underwood would disappoint in this manner, but I so hoped she wouldn’t. I don’t know anything about Underwood (I’ve never watched a single episode of American Idol), and I couldn’t name a song she’s ever written or sung.
In doing the research for this piece, one thing I did learn — something that stands out — is everyone makes a huge deal about her legs.
And being a country music singer, it makes sense that most of the photos I found were of her performing for country music audiences. So, not surprisingly, in the majority of the pictures, she is wearing denim shorts or dresses with cowboy boots and bear legs
But I did find some pictures of Underwood wearing a fancy dress with peep-toe stilettos and sheer fishnet pantyhose during — of all places — the 2009 CMA (Country Music Awards) show in Nashville, Tenn.
That made me think there was hope that she’d dress like this for SNF. But, then I found pics of her a year later wearing shorts, cowboy boots and bear legs during the 2010 CMA presentations.
That appears to be Underwood’s preferred look.
Now, don’t get me wrong. She looks good. I just don’t think the look is professional or classy enough for the intro theme to SNF.
In 2012, Sunday Night Football averaged 21 million viewers each week, according to Nielsen.
According to Wikipedia, American football is the most popular sport, and Super Bowl Sunday is the biggest annual sporting event held in the United States. In fact, the Super Bowl game is always among the highest-rated programs of all-time in Nielsen ratings.
Now, I’m wondering about the demographics of the national fan base of the NFL? What is the connection between the NFL and country music? In researching this question on the Internet, I couldn’t find that answer.
And what I could find about the average NFL viewer surprised me (only because the numbers are smaller than I anticipated): Men make up 62.8 percent, compared with women (37.2%), and the highest percentage of viewers by age is in the range of 35-44, which is 21.2 percent.
I don’t know. Apparently, the findings were in 2003 by Scarborough Research, so maybe the numbers are more impressive today.
I don’t think there’s ever been an official poll that measures the percentage of men in the world who say they prefer women in pantyhose over bear legs (I couldn’t find anything official), but my own poll that posed that question last year returned predictable numbers: Out of 485 total votes, 465 (96%) answered Yes.
So, here’s what perplexes me: If (we’ll be conservative here) more than half of the men in the world prefer women in pantyhose, and more than 50 percent of men watch the NFL, why would Carrie Underwood and Faith Hill before her perform the SNF intro theme bear-legged?
Conversely, most other professional singers perform on stage throughout the world’s largest venues wearing pantyhose.
To me, the answer is Underwood and Hill don’t have the professionalism or class that most other professional entertainers do.
Back in April, I wrote this post:
Who should NBC hire next to perform intro to SNF? in which I featured the professional singers I hoped would be considered to replace Hill. My first choice was Katy Perry, and most of you agreed, as supported by the poll I attached to that post:
Which celeb should be next to perform SNF intro?
Katy Perry 51 (59%)
Beyonce’ 10 (12%)
Lady Gaga 10 (12%)
Jennifer Lopez 5 (6%)
Taylor Swift 5 (6%)
Rihanna 3 (3%)
Other 3 (3%)
Selena Gomez 1
Gwen Stefani 1
Frankie Sanford 1
One thing I knew was, had NBC selected Katy Perry to perform the SNF theme song, she would have dressed beautifully in a great dress or shorts/jump suit with high heels and sheer pantyhose.
And so would Beyonce’, Rihanna, Taylor Swift …
I’ve written this before (and AKH just wrote this in his comment already) — NFL cheerleaders always wear pantyhose with their uniforms. Why? I mean it’s usually hot on the field, or raining, or cold, or snowing.
So why do the NFL cheerleaders wear pantyhose? Because it’s more professional than bear legs. It’s classy. It looks awesome on them.
And it’s the NFL. The NFL has always cared about its image. Never more than in recent years. So, if the cheerleaders have the professionalism and class to wear pantyhose as the integral part of their uniforms that they are, why would Underwood, and Hill before her, think their bear legs are appropriate in representing the NFL?
In the case of Carrie Underwood, well, all I can say is it’s a missed opportunity to build a professional and classy image.
Too bad. I am officially not a Carrie Underwood fan.
All we can do now is just be happy that football is back.